10 Apples To Tempt Microsoft

The annual Macworld Conference in later this month - when scholars Microsoft inevitably pit Apple in its various analyses. Formula is quite predictable, is the result. Typical findings: "Microsoft should learn from these lessons, from the Apple" or "Microsoft should be taken from a Apple book. " Course, there are a number of local apples, the next Microsoft, in particular In "br> in the field of design and packaging. But not all, it is worthwhile to think that Apple redmondians by simulation. In fact, in some strategic moves, Apple Computer 23 are in the past Microsoft should be avoided.

Here is my top 10. Microsoft should not be : 1. Ran - Ran power third-party developers. Although many In "br> open source community love Mac OS operating system, but the reality is that Apple makes their lives from proprietary systems. There may be a change in the coming time, given Apple iPhone long overdue release of the SDK.

2. I believe no one can "think different" from the top Apple arrogant. Soft, as can be proud of - if not more so - require any person in the development of high-tech industries. But Microsofts arrogance, were tempered bound by the self-awareness of questioning, and was willing to reflect on "how we suck." 3. Suppose you press a small group of "friends", will protect you permanent. Apple appears to manually select which news / reviews, products on the basis of how they help their coverage. If Microsoft tried to operate this, the company is likely to be indicted.

4. An attempt to prohibit the use of the "M" promises. Apples public relations was recently wanton capture on tape the interview, when a reporter asked whether iTunes may be considered illegal monopoly . Microsoft may be as high as hate "M" word, monopoly allegations and questions are going to plague The company is it the remaining days.

5. Ding your existing customers, and expect them to remain loyal. Can you imagine , anger, if Microsofts customers queuing days before rolling a new product (iPhone), not only substantially reduce the number of 100 US dollars-off, the prices few months after launch? 6. Charged blog. The lawsuit on the topic, what are the heck is Apple thinking when sued blog published a few years ago, allegedly Apple trade transfer to their confidential sources? Microsoft has shaken some cages discourage reporters from the open and fair access to information from the leak, but it respect for the freedom of the press.

7. I believe no comment (black turtlenecks) will be made to identify all . I have been the recipient of a large number of Microsofts "no comment." When trying to report / confirmation of a story. But at least I have no comment. Doubt Apple - by the press, developers and users - often go to answer or answered in doublespeak. Is cool does not mean being indifferent.

8. Throwing stones at this time, everyone is a high-tech world in a transparent live in glass houses. Soft must love the crash of Mac OS Leopard iPhone and the masonry, particularly Apples campaigns, and banished Vista "I was a MAC / I is a computer" ads.

9. Looking forward to a "RDF" is an eternal field. One of the RDF is a distortion of reality field (that is, the combination of charisma, personal charm and beliefs continuation of Apple and its followers is Apple The centre of the universe).

Microsoft is not what a fan boy scouts, instant impulse MAC zealots, but then blind supporters, can be quickly into an angry mob.

10. Bank of consumer sales, business sales lead. Apple has done a few access to business users. Behind the message: If business users are smart, hip and cool enough, they will understand why Apple products superior.

Now, Microsoft officials have taken the legitimate Microsofts growth in the consumer electronics claimed by the investment of high-tech innovation, from the consumer , rather than operational users, Microsoft could follow the same path.

There any other opinions as soft what they should copy or avoid plagiarism Apple machines?